During the construction process of a high rise condominium the client purchased a Tiete Chestnut engineered wood floor. Shortly after install the floor began to show a few surface checks. Within 5 weeks the floor looked like this and I was called in to complete a wood floor inspection to determine the cause of the checking. How could this happen in such a short period of time?
A wood floor inspection process will identify the cause of the checking. Keep in mind the wood floor will tell you the story and it
NEVER lies. Let start the process with claim history, a very important part of inspections including interviews with all parties involved to determine an unbiased opinion.
Claim History:
- Flooring selection made at the GC’s design center in October 7, 2011
- Flooring was ordered by designer on October 17, 2011
- Flooring arrived at distribution and took delivery on November 1, 2011
- Flooring was delivered to the jobsite on November 14, 2011
- Flooring installer (subcontractor) began installation November 19, 2011
- Flooring installation completed November 23, 2011
- Owner noticed a few small checks in flooring on November 30, 2011
- Construction meeting was held and portable humidifiers (5) were brought in December 1, 2011
- Second construction meeting held December 9, 2011 and checking has worsened.
- Installer commissioned a wood floor inspection on December 30, 2011
The Process:
Interview with Sales Team: This is a design studio for the GC where most of the interior finish selections are made including flooring. During the interview with the sales team who worked with the owners making the flooring selection mentioned this was the floor the owner wanted. During the sales process there was some discussion about maintaining proper relative humidity (RH) requirements outlined by the manufacturer.
Interview with Installer: Requested flooring contractor field notes and recorded as follows:
Wood MC 7-9%
Subfloor 2.8 – 3# (ASTM 1869)
RH Interior RH ranged from 30 to 38 during installation
Witnessed photos and log sheet to confirm information accuracy
Interview with GC: Project manager stated the checking began almost immediately after install which indicated to them that it must be a wood problem. Why 5 portable humidifiers? He stated the mechanical contractor ordered the wrong parts and new parts
are on back order. I requested the RH levels he recorded at the site meeting and he said they were around 22%.
Inspection: Upon inspection there were 5 portable humidifiers yet the RH couldn’t get above 15%, some rooms measured 9%. The entire floor has severe checking where the flooring wear layer looks like a shattered windshield. The built in humidifier on the HVAC system was present, however was non functioning due to back ordered parts.
Cause of Concern: The floor was installed to manufacturers RH parameters, yet the HVAC system could not support these requirements post installation. The manufacturer guidelines clearly state RH requirements must be maintained between 30 and 55% pre, during and post installation. The project manager scheduled the installation knowing the humidifier was non functioning. The weather during the installation was mild, however immediately after install the weather turned for the worse and near 10ºF. The portable humidifiers could not keep up with the demand. The checking is caused from decline in moisture content since the day of installation.
Cure: There is no easy fix; full replacement is the only choice.
Call the Question: How could have this disaster been prevented? What solution can be offered to resolve these business relationships?